Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

Take Action

Ensure a fair hearing for Solicitor General Kagan for Supreme Court

Up-to-the-minute updates on Twitter

Texas women - we need your story!

» more action alerts

Recent Headlines

7/15/2010
New health care law raises questions on abortions

6/21/2010
Group to Offer Adoption Advice in Abortion Clinics

6/18/2010
FDA Advisers Back Approval Of Longer-Acting Pill

» more recent headlines

Press Releases

4/8/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas Applauds Signing of the Limited-Service Pregnancy Centers Disclosure Ordinance

4/2/2010
Pro-Choice Austinites Praise City Council Members for Introducing Commonsense Ordinance Aimed at Crisis Pregnancy Centers

1/27/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice America Statement on Rise in Teen-Pregnancy Rate

» more press releases

House Republicans Want to Schedule Vote on Abortion Bill While They Still Can

Posted: 11/30/2006

By LAURIE KELLMAN
Associated Press Writer
November 29, 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) -- While they still can, House Republicans are looking at scheduling a vote next week on a fetal pain abortion bill in a parting shot at incoming majority Democrats and a last bid for loyalty from the GOP's base of social conservatives.

The measure is tentatively on House GOP leaders' list of bills to be considered in a lame-duck session before Democrats assume control of Congress. It has no chance of passing the Senate during the waning days of Republican control. But, with Democrats ascending to agenda-setting roles, passage isn't the point, said one conservative leader.

"Next year, the leadership of the House will be hardcore pro-abortion loyalists," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee. "They will block votes on even modest pro-life measures like this one."

The vote would be the first on the measure, which was introduced in September and referred to a health subcommittee, where no action on it was taken. Johnson said his group wants a House vote to test support for the measure.

The bill, by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., defines a 20-week-old fetus as a "pain-capable unborn child" - a highly controversial threshold among scientists. It also directs the Health and Human Service Department to develop a brochure stating "that there is substantial evidence that the process of being killed in an abortion will cause the unborn child pain."

Abortion providers would be required to inform the mothers that evidence exists that the procedure would cause pain to the child and offer the mothers anesthesia for the baby. The mothers would accept or reject the anesthesia by signing a form. The bill allows for an exception for certified medical emergencies.

When fetuses can feel pain - versus a reflexive drawing back from stimuli - has been the subject of heated debate. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco last year reviewed dozens of studies and medical reports and said that fetuses likely are incapable of feeling pain until around the seventh month of pregnancy, when they are about 28 weeks old.

That report hardly settled the issue for Johnson's group. The legislation would enshrine other evidence that fetuses "would experience great pain during abortions by 20 weeks," the Right to Life Committee said in a letter this week to House members.

The bill is H.R. 6099.

© 2006 The Associated Press

Home | Get Involved | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us | Related Resources
Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas