Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

Take Action

Texas women - we need your story!

What's the problem with crisis pregnancy centers?

Does your pharmacy carry the morning-after pill?

» more action alerts

Recent Headlines

11/12/2008
Abortion limits, tuition relief among bills filed

11/12/2008
Flurry of bill filings hint at Texas lawmakers' priorities

11/7/2008
Pregnancy discrimination complaints jump, especially for women of color

» more recent headlines

Press Releases

11/12/2008
Healthy Women, Healthy Families Coalition Invites Austin Families to Public Forum on Women’s Health

10/1/2008
HEALTHY WOMEN, HEALTHY FAMILIES COALITION FORMED TO COLLECT HEALTHCARE STORIES FROM 2,000 TEXAS WOMEN

8/25/2008
President of NARAL Pro-Choice America Delivers Speech at Democratic National Convention

» more press releases

Sex, Science and Savings

Posted: 12/03/2007

Editorial
The New York Times
December 2, 2007

President Bush’s veto of Congress’s main social spending bill has Democratic leaders looking for places to make trims to satisfy the president’s sudden zeal for fiscal discipline. A small, but sensible, place to begin would be to eliminate the bill’s $28 million increase for one of Mr. Bush’s signature boondoggles — abstinence-only sex education.

Federal government spending on highly restrictive abstinence-only sex education has ballooned under President Bush, while evidence of the program’s danger as a public health strategy has continued to mount.

Last April, a Congressionally mandated evaluation found that students who received abstinence instruction in elementary and middle school were just as likely to have sex in the following years as students who did not get such instruction.

States are catching on. Last month, Virginia became the 14th state to reject federal grant money for abstinence-only sex education to pursue the comprehensive approach supported by science and most Americans. That approach encourages abstinence but also arms young people with information about sexually transmitted diseases, contraceptives and pregnancy.

Expectations that the new Democratic Congress would confront the abstinence-only hoax have proved unfounded. Instead of cutting support, or at least ditching outrageous rules that restrict information about condoms and contraception, the vetoed spending plan actually increased money for faith-based and other groups offering abstinence education programs above the wasteful $113 million allotted for the current fiscal year.

The weak link is the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes the administration’s ineffective abstinence-only approach. But she seems to have ceded the issue to Representative David Obey, the House Appropriations chairman, who continues to insist on using it as bait for Republican votes on a budget compromise. Forgoing principle failed to produce a veto-proof majority for the spending bill the first time. Ms. Pelosi needs to reconsider whether expanding a discredited sex education program should be on the rather meager list of achievements of the first Democratic Congress in a decade.

Home | Get Involved | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us | Related Resources
Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas