Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

Take Action

Tell HHSC to stop funding crisis pregnancy centers in Texas

Up-to-the-minute updates on Twitter

Texas women - we need your story!

» more action alerts

Recent Headlines

10/31/2011
NARAL: Texas’ Alternatives to Abortion program is bad policy

10/31/2011
In Romney’s Backyard, Perry Highlights Abortion

10/6/2011
When I Needed Help, I Got Propaganda

» more recent headlines

Press Releases

4/23/2011
THE TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE NETWORK: A TAXPAYER-FUNDED FAILURE

2/9/2011
NARAL Pro-Choice America Statement on Cuts to Family Planning Funding

» more press releases

Sex, Science and Savings

Posted: 12/03/2007

Editorial
The New York Times
December 2, 2007

President Bush’s veto of Congress’s main social spending bill has Democratic leaders looking for places to make trims to satisfy the president’s sudden zeal for fiscal discipline. A small, but sensible, place to begin would be to eliminate the bill’s $28 million increase for one of Mr. Bush’s signature boondoggles — abstinence-only sex education.

Federal government spending on highly restrictive abstinence-only sex education has ballooned under President Bush, while evidence of the program’s danger as a public health strategy has continued to mount.

Last April, a Congressionally mandated evaluation found that students who received abstinence instruction in elementary and middle school were just as likely to have sex in the following years as students who did not get such instruction.

States are catching on. Last month, Virginia became the 14th state to reject federal grant money for abstinence-only sex education to pursue the comprehensive approach supported by science and most Americans. That approach encourages abstinence but also arms young people with information about sexually transmitted diseases, contraceptives and pregnancy.

Expectations that the new Democratic Congress would confront the abstinence-only hoax have proved unfounded. Instead of cutting support, or at least ditching outrageous rules that restrict information about condoms and contraception, the vetoed spending plan actually increased money for faith-based and other groups offering abstinence education programs above the wasteful $113 million allotted for the current fiscal year.

The weak link is the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes the administration’s ineffective abstinence-only approach. But she seems to have ceded the issue to Representative David Obey, the House Appropriations chairman, who continues to insist on using it as bait for Republican votes on a budget compromise. Forgoing principle failed to produce a veto-proof majority for the spending bill the first time. Ms. Pelosi needs to reconsider whether expanding a discredited sex education program should be on the rather meager list of achievements of the first Democratic Congress in a decade.

Home | Get Involved | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us | Related Resources
Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas