Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

Take Action

Ensure a fair hearing for Solicitor General Kagan for Supreme Court

Up-to-the-minute updates on Twitter

Texas women - we need your story!

» more action alerts

Recent Headlines

7/15/2010
New health care law raises questions on abortions

6/21/2010
Group to Offer Adoption Advice in Abortion Clinics

6/18/2010
FDA Advisers Back Approval Of Longer-Acting Pill

» more recent headlines

Press Releases

4/8/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice Texas Applauds Signing of the Limited-Service Pregnancy Centers Disclosure Ordinance

4/2/2010
Pro-Choice Austinites Praise City Council Members for Introducing Commonsense Ordinance Aimed at Crisis Pregnancy Centers

1/27/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice America Statement on Rise in Teen-Pregnancy Rate

» more press releases

More Than 150 Congressional Democrats Express Opposition to Proposed HHS Rule

Posted: 10/02/2008

National Partnership for Women & Families
Daily Women's Health Policy Report
October 2, 2008
 
Democrats in both the House and Senate submitted letters of opposition last week to a proposed HHS rule that would allow health care providers who receive federal grants to opt out of care they object to based on moral or religious grounds, CongressDaily reports. The Senate letter sent to HHS last week was signed by 28 Senators. The House letter was signed by 126 Representatives. The Senate letter concludes that the proposed rule is "damaging to the health care needs of women, their families and all Americans and will only serve to cause havoc, not clarity, among employers and employees in the health care field."

Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Patty Murray (Wash.); Reps. Diana DeGette (Colo.) and Nita Lowey (N.Y.); House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chair Henry Waxman (Calif.) and House Rules Committee Chair Louise Slaughter (N.Y.) led the effort to oppose the rule (Edney, CongressDaily, 10/2). Both senators on the Democratic presidential ticket, Barack Obama (Ill.) and Joe Biden (Del.), signed the Senate letter (Clinton release, 9/25).

According to the Senate letter, the rule could "complicate the administration of long-standing and vital federal family planning programs, as well as state laws adopted to protect access to contraception." The lawmakers add that because the proposal does not define abortion, it would allow health care professionals to deny patients contraception based on religious belief that contraception is the same as abortion. The letter also said it could limit insurance coverage of birth control.

The lawmakers argue that the rule is a last-minute effort by the Bush administration to restrict women's access to contraceptives. The Democrats also argued that the proposal is discriminatory, writing that it "simply includes language prohibiting discrimination in specific circumstances ... and ignores the inevitable confusion and potential conflict with other employment protections."

HHS spokesperson Christina Pearson said HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt has previously stated that the agency's "goal remains to address the need for greater awareness and compliance with laws enacted by Congress to protect the right of health care providers to practice according to their own conscience." According to CongressDaily, the regulation would affect each state government and about 584,000 hospitals, medical schools, physicians' offices and pharmacies that receive federal funding (CongressDaily, 10/2).

Home | Get Involved | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us | Related Resources
Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas

©NARAL Pro-Choice Texas